2018年11月11日托福考試已經(jīng)塵埃落定，大家覺(jué)得獨(dú)立寫(xiě)作的題目難度如何？下面牛學(xué)君為大家?guī)?lái)11月11日托福獨(dú)立寫(xiě)作真題回憶范文解析。

第一段，總述確定觀點(diǎn)

An individual’s dietary choice and dining timetable matter to the person’s physical wellness and general wellbeing. As the choice is made, it may be made by the individual alone or under the government’s guidance. In most cases, the choice is personal and probably irresponsible, and the authority does not intervene adequately.

個(gè)人的飲食選擇和用餐時(shí)間關(guān)系到個(gè)人的身體健康和整體健康。在作出選擇時(shí)，可以由個(gè)人單獨(dú)作出，也可以由政府指導(dǎo)。在大多數(shù)情況下，選擇是個(gè)人的，而且可能是不負(fù)責(zé)任的，政府沒(méi)有充分干預(yù)。

第二段，展開(kāi)論述

For starters, there are two reasons that may be no brainers. Frist, few public service ads about healthful eating are seen.  For example, seldom do people find enough ads that promote healthy eating, when they walk in the streets, turn on the TV or unfold a newspaper. Instead, they are bombarded with countless commercials of junk food, such as chips, biscuits, and instant noodles.  Second, the subject that teach humans’nutritional need is absent in the public schools’curriculum.  Since the curriculum is designed by the government, the absence should be attributed to the government’s negligence.

有兩個(gè)明顯的原因。首先，很少看到關(guān)于健康飲食的公共服務(wù)廣告。例如，當(dāng)人們走在大街上、打開(kāi)電視或打開(kāi)報(bào)紙時(shí)，很少能找到足夠的廣告來(lái)宣傳健康飲食。相反，他們被無(wú)數(shù)垃圾食品的廣告轟炸，如薯片、餅干和方便面。其次，教授人類營(yíng)養(yǎng)需求的主題在公立學(xué)校的課程中是不存在的。由于課程是由政府設(shè)計(jì)的，缺席應(yīng)該歸咎于政府的疏忽。

第三段，展開(kāi)論述

There is another reason that may be controversial. Our government fails to legally inform our fellow citizens of the need for proper eating. The reality is that most countries do not have laws that tell the citizens to eat properly. However, just as smoking can be outlawed, having a nutritious and balanced diet can be legally required. Some would oppose this idea for the reason that the law would be a nanny-state legislation that interferes with people’s lifestyle choice. Nevertheless, when citizens are unconscious of their unhealthy diet or knowingly irresponsible in eating, why do we question the legitimacy of the administration’s intent to prohibit of a lifestyle that incurs medical bills that are too massive to be redeemed?

還有另一個(gè)比較有爭(zhēng)議的原因。我們的政府沒(méi)有在法律上告知公民需要適當(dāng)飲食。現(xiàn)實(shí)情況是，大多數(shù)國(guó)家都沒(méi)有法律要求公民合理飲食。然而，吸煙可判定為違法，有一個(gè)營(yíng)養(yǎng)均衡的飲食可判定為合法。但一些人會(huì)反對(duì)這一想法，理由是這項(xiàng)法律將是一項(xiàng)干擾人們生活方式選擇的保姆國(guó)家立法。然而，當(dāng)公民意識(shí)不到自己不健康的飲食習(xí)慣，或者明知是不負(fù)責(zé)任的飲食習(xí)慣時(shí)，為什么還要質(zhì)疑政府呢?

結(jié)尾段，總結(jié)

In conclusion, government is not doing its job adequately in educating people the importance of nutrition and healthful eating. It would be enough, if government did enough publicity about healthy eating, incorporated the knowledge about nutrition into the school curriculum, or mandated a healthy diet.

總而言之，政府在教育人們營(yíng)養(yǎng)和健康飲食的重要性方面做得也還不夠。如果政府對(duì)健康飲食做足夠的宣傳，將營(yíng)養(yǎng)知識(shí)納入學(xué)校課程，或強(qiáng)制規(guī)定健康飲食，那樣就好了。

以上是牛學(xué)君為大家整理的2018年11月11日托福獨(dú)立寫(xiě)作范文分析，大家可以學(xué)習(xí)范文的依稀而優(yōu)秀表達(dá)，也可以學(xué)習(xí)范文的邏輯思維。